Gas Safety Week launches a competition for kids

russellkramerTo mark Gas Safety Week (September 15–21), Gas Safe Register is launching a drawing and story writing competition for children. The ‘My Gas Safe Hero’ competition is open to children, aged between four and 12, who have a relative or family friend that is a registered engineer.

To enter, children need to submit a picture or story showing their registered engineer relative or family friend as a ‘Gas Safe Hero’. Pictures and stories should be of or about the child’s relative or family friend at work – keeping people safe from dangerous gas appliances.

Entries will be posted onto the Gas Safety Week website, as well as being shared on social media and potentially with the press. Deadline for entries is July 25.

The competition winner will win an iPad Mini and have their drawing or story turned into an animation that will be unveiled at the Gas Safety Week launch event held on September 9 at the Houses of Parliament. The winner, and their family, will be invited to attend.

Russell Kramer, chief executive for Gas Safe Register, said:

“This competition aims to celebrate the role registered engineers play in keeping the nation’s 23 million gas consumer safe. It’s also a great opportunity for engineers’ families and friends to get involved in Gas Safety Week.

“In addition to the competition, we’re also asking engineers to tell us how they’ve gone above and beyond’ to keep an individual, family or community gas safe and become a Gas Safe Hero. Heroes’ stories will appear on the Gas Safety Week website and may also be shared with the media – it’s just another way we’re looking to shine a light on the good work of engineers this Gas Safety Week.”

As in previous years, engineers can also pledge their support for Gas Safety Week and get involved in sharing vital gas safety advice with the public.

 

Tagged with: , , , , ,

Cosentino Design Challenge winners chosen

Cosentino-Design-ChallengeCosentino has announced that the Cosentino Design Challenge Jury has selected the winners of the 8th edition. Prizes are awarded for two categories, Architecture and Design and each category was awarded with three individual prizes of €1,000 each.

The Cosentino Design Challenge is a competition for design, architecture and interior architecture students anywhere in the world. It aims to foster the talent of students and promote research into the different conceptual approaches to the layout of spaces, materials and the construction systems that define them, using materials made by The Cosentino Group.

A total of twelve institutions, schools and international universities actively participated in the Cosentino Design Challenge 2014, and this year’s competition received a total of 212 applications; 72 projects for the architecture category and 140 projects for the design category.

The competition’s verdict took place on 24 June, in the cultural center CaixaForum in Madrid. During this meeting, proposals for the theme of the ninth edition of the Cosentino Design Challenge was discussed, which will be launched later this year.

The posters of the winners are available on the website of the International Competition Cosentino Design Challenge: www.cosentinodesignchallenge.org

Tagged with: , ,

Vasco Beams radiator receives Red Dot Award

vascoThe Vasco Beams aluminium radiator is a winner of the Red Dot Award 2014; awarded for Product Design.

The 40 member panel of international experts discussed and evaluated 4,815 entries from 53 countries, but only the designs that impressed the jury with quality and innovative strength won an award. The Beams radiator from Vasco, part of the recently rebranded Vasco Group (formerly The Heating Company), was successful and received the coveted Red Dot quality seal as its reward.

Prof. Dr. Peter Zec, initiator and CEO of Red Dot, said:

“The winners can be proud of their achievements with their entries; they stood out from the rest and were able to pass the test in front of the critical eyes of the experts.”

www.vasco.eu/EN_GB

Tagged with: , , ,

Designer Awards deadline extended

MartinDue to popular demand, the deadline for Designer Awards entries has been extended to Thursday 10 July 2014 so you now have extra time to prepare and submit your submissions.

Martin Allen-Smith (seen here), editor of Designer Kitchen & Bathroom Magazine and chair of the Awards’ judges panel said:

“The Designer Kitchen & Bathroom Awards are the ultimate accolade for kitchen and bathroom designers, offering an opportunity for the industry’s best design talent to receive the recognition they deserve,”

“Entries will be considered by our judging panel, made up of experts from all corners of the K&B, architecture, product design, and interior design sectors, with finalists given the opportunity to attend the gala presentation luncheon in London on 12 November 2014.”

The deadline extension for Designer Awards also includes the Product Innovation Award categories, showcasing the most innovative and creative new products to launch to the market during the past year.

Entries for all categories can be submitted online by visiting www.designerkbawards.com and clicking on ‘How to Enter’.

Good luck!

Tagged with: , ,

Endorsement from Worcester on Queen’s zero carbon homes stance

martynA spokesperson for heating and hot water technologies, Worcester, Bosch Group, has sympathised with the disappointment surrounding the Queen’s speech on zero carbon homes, but ultimately considers the announcement commonsensical for the nation’s construction sector.

Amid criticism of the alleged ‘watering down’ of zero carbon homes targets, Martyn Bridges, director of marketing and technical, believes more pragmatic targets are necessary in order for the new build sector to double its output and overcome the UK’s housing shortage.

Martyn said:

“Despite the criticism levelled at the government for its supposed abandonment of its zero carbon homes targets, there is pressure on the construction sector to increase the amount of new homes being built to meet the ever increasing demand. It is evident that to meet the ever-increasing need for new homes, it is both financially and technically difficult to achieve zero carbon in such high volumes, suggesting the treasury may have had an involvement in setting more achievable targets.

“The impracticality and the additional cost of equipping all new homes with a whole host of renewable technologies risked burdening housebuilders with too many hurdles to overcome. By not being too prescriptive, the new proposals around allowable solutions give housebuilders themselves the option to take a more holistic approach to enhancing their overall environmental contribution.

“While there’s no doubt the revised targets themselves are a climb down, they are at least more realistic than those set before the recession – particularly given that renewables simply haven’t taken off in the way we would have liked.”

Martyn believes that a huge shift in the mindsets of UK homeowners will need to take place before the new build sector can consider the previous targets a realistic aim once more.

He added:

“While the regulations weren’t prescriptive in specifying the technologies required to meet the zero carbon target, the most likely way to achieve it  was to install a heat pump system. Despite its billing as the future of efficient domestic heating, the heat pump is a concept most UK homeowners are yet to embrace. The very nature of a heat pump providing a low-temperature, trickle-based heating supply is so different to the manner in which we’re used to using a boiler that we need to bring homeowners around to this way of thinking before designing our homes around the concept. Ultimately, a properly controlled boiler is far more effective and efficient than a poorly-used heat pump, so we certainly welcome the decision to not prohibit the installation of gas- or oil-fired boilers in new domestic properties.

“Despite welcoming the general approach laid out by the Queen’s speech, Martyn echoes criticisms levelled at the decision to exempt smaller new build developments from the zero carbon standard, asking: “Why should a small residential development be given less of a carbon standard than a larger site? By having one rule for developments comprising fewer than 50 properties and another for larger sites, we are essentially leaving housebuilders free to divide their larger sites into multiple developments to avoid playing by the rules. This surely defeats the object of introducing a new zero homes standard in the first place.”

Tagged with: , , , , ,
Top